<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DOJ DOMA Case Filing Says Government Doesn&#8217;t Care If Parents Are Biological</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mombian.com/2009/08/17/doj-doma-case-filing-says-government-doesnt-care-if-parents-are-biological/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mombian.com/2009/08/17/doj-doma-case-filing-says-government-doesnt-care-if-parents-are-biological/</link>
	<description>Sustenance for Lesbian Moms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2009/08/17/doj-doma-case-filing-says-government-doesnt-care-if-parents-are-biological/comment-page-1/#comment-92929</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=5563#comment-92929</guid>
		<description>Good question. It was actually under Obama, back in June. &lt;a href=&quot;http://ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&amp;article=3994&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; some background on it. Basically, they said even then that they didn&#039;t like DOMA, but standard DOJ policy was to defend existing law. Yesterday&#039;s brief expressed their displeasure with DOMA more strongly, and added the bit about parenting, which, as Chris Geidner noted, may have far-reaching positive consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question. It was actually under Obama, back in June. <a href="http://ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&amp;article=3994" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s</a> some background on it. Basically, they said even then that they didn&#8217;t like DOMA, but standard DOJ policy was to defend existing law. Yesterday&#8217;s brief expressed their displeasure with DOMA more strongly, and added the bit about parenting, which, as Chris Geidner noted, may have far-reaching positive consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2009/08/17/doj-doma-case-filing-says-government-doesnt-care-if-parents-are-biological/comment-page-1/#comment-92928</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=5563#comment-92928</guid>
		<description>Great review of the administration&#039;s actions on DOMA. One question though- when was the earlier DOJ opinion written? Was that from the Obama or Bush DOJ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review of the administration&#8217;s actions on DOMA. One question though- when was the earlier DOJ opinion written? Was that from the Obama or Bush DOJ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

