<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cynthia Nixon on Marriage Equality and Stepparenting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/</link>
	<description>Sustenance for Lesbian Moms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane and Jane Magazine, Celebrating Lesbian Living</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-92411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane and Jane Magazine, Celebrating Lesbian Living</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-92411</guid>
		<description>[...] Marinoni, the stay-at-home mom, has no legal right to their children if Nixon dies. She said this back in November as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marinoni, the stay-at-home mom, has no legal right to their children if Nixon dies. She said this back in November as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mombian: Sustenance for Lesbian Moms &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cynthia Nixon&#8217;s Partner Won&#8217;t Get Parental Rights with Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-92048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mombian: Sustenance for Lesbian Moms &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Cynthia Nixon&#8217;s Partner Won&#8217;t Get Parental Rights with Marriage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 05:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-92048</guid>
		<description>[...] Christine, the stay-at-home mom, has no legal right to their children if Nixon dies. She said this back in November as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christine, the stay-at-home mom, has no legal right to their children if Nixon dies. She said this back in November as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-84574</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-84574</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s the general wisdom in LGBT legal circles, Kathygnome. As I understand it (and I&#039;m not a lawyer), if the legal basis for the parent-child relationship has come from the parents&#039; relationship, as with a non-bio mom on a child&#039;s birth cert, states that don&#039;t recognize the parents&#039; relationship might not recognize the nonbio-child relationship either. An adoption or court order is the only way to guarantee the parent-child relationship will be protected everywhere.

Good point, though, and one that bears repeating, because it&#039;s not obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the general wisdom in LGBT legal circles, Kathygnome. As I understand it (and I&#8217;m not a lawyer), if the legal basis for the parent-child relationship has come from the parents&#8217; relationship, as with a non-bio mom on a child&#8217;s birth cert, states that don&#8217;t recognize the parents&#8217; relationship might not recognize the nonbio-child relationship either. An adoption or court order is the only way to guarantee the parent-child relationship will be protected everywhere.</p>
<p>Good point, though, and one that bears repeating, because it&#8217;s not obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathygnome</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-84545</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathygnome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-84545</guid>
		<description>Even if a child is born to a marriage as a result of AI in Mass and both names are on the birth certificate, we were advised at the Fenway&#039;s AI clinic to go through either a second parent adoption or court finding of parenthood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if a child is born to a marriage as a result of AI in Mass and both names are on the birth certificate, we were advised at the Fenway&#8217;s AI clinic to go through either a second parent adoption or court finding of parenthood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Polikoff</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-84541</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Polikoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-84541</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Dana. And I find this very interesting...A friend of mine in Massachusetts, who is very active in LGBT issues, married her partner who is the bio mom of the children they are raising.  When we talked, she seemed to think this gave her some legal status with the children.  It doesn&#039;t...at least not much.  When a custodial parent dies, the non-custodial parent gets the children.  Some states will allow a third party to make an argument that the children should stay with them, but it&#039;s an uphill climb.  Also, pardon me for not knowing where Cynthia Nixon lives, but if she lives in California and is in a registered domestic partnership, then Marinoni is already the stepparent of her children.  Oh..okay..I just listened to the interview and it turns out she lives in New York, but she&#039;s not going to Connecticut or Massachusetts to marry because she wants to wait til it comes to her home.  Well, New York is the one state that is recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages in many instances...so what exactly is she waiting for?  But, again, it won&#039;t be her partner gets the kids if she dies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Dana. And I find this very interesting&#8230;A friend of mine in Massachusetts, who is very active in LGBT issues, married her partner who is the bio mom of the children they are raising.  When we talked, she seemed to think this gave her some legal status with the children.  It doesn&#8217;t&#8230;at least not much.  When a custodial parent dies, the non-custodial parent gets the children.  Some states will allow a third party to make an argument that the children should stay with them, but it&#8217;s an uphill climb.  Also, pardon me for not knowing where Cynthia Nixon lives, but if she lives in California and is in a registered domestic partnership, then Marinoni is already the stepparent of her children.  Oh..okay..I just listened to the interview and it turns out she lives in New York, but she&#8217;s not going to Connecticut or Massachusetts to marry because she wants to wait til it comes to her home.  Well, New York is the one state that is recognizing out-of-state same-sex marriages in many instances&#8230;so what exactly is she waiting for?  But, again, it won&#8217;t be her partner gets the kids if she dies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FranIAm</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2008/11/17/cynthia-nixon-on-marriage-equality-and-stepparenting/comment-page-1/#comment-84423</link>
		<dc:creator>FranIAm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mombian.com/?p=2538#comment-84423</guid>
		<description>Curious indeed... As a step-parent I understand this as you do. There are, as you point out, a veritable tangle of legal matters. Which is why the topic of marriage alone can&#039;t be the end all/be all, but must be the cornerstone of clarification and of justice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious indeed&#8230; As a step-parent I understand this as you do. There are, as you point out, a veritable tangle of legal matters. Which is why the topic of marriage alone can&#8217;t be the end all/be all, but must be the cornerstone of clarification and of justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

