<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honoring Loving v. Virginia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/</link>
	<description>Sustenance for Lesbian Moms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-49495</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/#comment-49495</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more. I just wonder if we&#039;ll be able to find a couple with a similarly perfect name to represent us at the Supreme Court. &quot;Sue and Jane Liberty&quot; perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I just wonder if we&#8217;ll be able to find a couple with a similarly perfect name to represent us at the Supreme Court. &#8220;Sue and Jane Liberty&#8221; perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/comment-page-1/#comment-49439</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mombian.com/2007/06/12/honoring-loving-v-virginia/#comment-49439</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Dana, for posting this!  Loving v. Virginia is so critical to the ongoing battle for marriage rights.  It shows detractors that something &quot;naturalized&quot; as counter to nature or god, in one half of a century, can transition to something else entirely a half a century later.  I know that many have written about the degrees to which the two struggles (anti- anti-miscegenationist and pro LGBT marriage) can be likened, and contrasts abound.  Still, I take a great deal of heart from the case, and hope that forty years from now (or sooner?) I&#039;ll still be alive to see a similar turning of the tide for LGBT partnerships.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Dana, for posting this!  Loving v. Virginia is so critical to the ongoing battle for marriage rights.  It shows detractors that something &#8220;naturalized&#8221; as counter to nature or god, in one half of a century, can transition to something else entirely a half a century later.  I know that many have written about the degrees to which the two struggles (anti- anti-miscegenationist and pro LGBT marriage) can be likened, and contrasts abound.  Still, I take a great deal of heart from the case, and hope that forty years from now (or sooner?) I&#8217;ll still be alive to see a similar turning of the tide for LGBT partnerships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

